Historic Preservation

Name John Orfitelli
Email john.orfitelli@yahoo.com
Website historicpreservation@townofnewpaltz.org
Address PO Box 550
1 Veteran Drive
New Paltz, NY 12561
Phone 845 594-9432

Legislative Intent

 


It is hereby declared as a matter of public policy that the protection, enhancement and perpetuation of landmarks and historic districts are necessary to promote the economic, cultural and general welfare of the public. Inasmuch as the identity of a people is founded on its past, and inasmuch as the Town of New Paltz has many significant historic, architectural and cultural resources which constitute its heritage, this article is intended to:
           A. Protect and enhance the landmarks and historic districts which present distinctive elements of the
                historic, architectural and cultural heritage of the Town;

           B. Focus attention on and foster civic pride in the historic resources of the Town; 

           C. Protect and enhance the attractiveness of the Town to visitors and support and provide stimulus

               the local economy; and

           D. Ensure the harmonious, orderly and efficient growth and development of the Town.

  

Commission Established

 


There is hereby established a commission to be known as the "Historic Preservation Commission of the Town of New Paltz," hereinafter referred to as the "Commission."

  

Membership; Terms of Office; Officers; Meetings; Quorum

 


The Commission shall consist of five members who shall be appointed by the Town Board. Persons residing within the Town of New Paltz who shall have demonstrated significant interest in and commitment to the field of historic preservation evidenced by involvement in a local historic preservation group, employment or volunteer activity in the field of historic preservation, or other serious interest in the field shall be eligible for appointment as members of the Commission. The Town Historian shall be an ex officio member of the Commission.

Commission members shall serve for a term of four years, with the exception of the initial term of one of the members which shall be one year, one which shall be two years, one which shall be three years, and two which shall be for four years.

 

The Town Board shall designate a member of the Commission to act as Chairman thereof. The Commission shall elect from among its members a Vice Chairman who shall serve as Recording Secretary.

 

The Commission shall meet at least bimonthly.

 

A quorum for the transaction of business shall consist of three of the Commission's members, but not less than a majority of the full authorized membership may render a decision regarding landmark status or grant or deny a certificate of appropriateness.
  
Powers and Duties

 


The powers and duties of the Commission shall include:

 

A. Employment of staff and professional consultants as necessary to carry out the duties of the Commission;

 

B. Promulgation of rules and regulations as necessary for the conduct of its business;

 

C. Conduct of surveys of significant historical, architectural and cultural landmarks and historic districts within the Town;

 

D. Proposal of identified structures or resources to be designated as landmarks and recommendations to the Town Board on the creation of historic districts;

 

E. Acceptance on behalf of the Town of the donation of facade easements and development rights; the making of recommendations to the Town Board concerning the acquisition of facade easements or other interests in real property as necessary to carry out the purposes of this article;

 

F. Increasing public awareness of the historic, cultural and architectural preservation of development and participating in public education programs;

 

G. Making recommendations to Town Board concerning the utilization of state, federal or private funds to promote the preservation of landmarks and historic districts with the Town;

 

H. Making recommendations to the Planning Board regarding applications for site plan review or subdivisions of real property containing landmarks or within a historic district;

 

I. Employment, where justified, of the use of special techniques or policies so as to improve the quality of the area or, where economic assistance is warranted, to provide such aids or other incentives so that privately owned properties may realize a reasonable economic return;

 

J. Recommending acquisition of a landmark structure by the Town Board where its preservation is essential to the purposes of this article and where private preservation is not feasible;

 

K. Approval or disapproval of applications for certificates of appropriateness pursuant to this article; and

 

L.Making recommendations to the Town Board for the creation and establishment of historic districts.
  
Compliance with State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)

 


The Historic Preservation Commission shall comply with the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act under Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and its implementing regulations.

 

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS INSTRUCTIONS

 

 

 

TOWN OF NEW PALTZ 

PO Box 550

1 Veteran Drive

NEW PALTZ, NEW YORK 12561

 (845) 594-9432   FAX (845) 255-4084

 

 

 

 

TOWN OF NEW PALTZ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION

 

INSTRUCTIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR

 

APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

 

(Pursuant to Article XIV 140-123 of the New Paltz Code)

IMPORTANT NOTE:  The Commission is mindful that the application form is somewhat lengthy and detailed.  Do not be discouraged!  It is that way only to lessen the possibility that relevant information may be omitted.  The Commission is aware that much of the information requested may be either non-applicable, unavailable or irrelevant.  The Commission is willing to be flexible in this regard and does not wish to deter the public from submitting an application.  Therefore, the applicant should feel free to leave blanks in the form where appropriate.

 

 

 

1.         Application Form.  The applicant should complete and sign the application form and submit the original to:

 

                                    Town of New Paltz Historic Preservation Commission

                                    c/o John Orfitelli

                                    Town of New Paltz

                                    PO Box 550

                                    1 Veteran Drive           

                                    New Paltz, New York 12561

 

            Be sure to make a copy of the application for yourself.

 

2.         Additional Materials.  To the extent applicable and available, the application should be accompanied by:

   

 ●       Photographs of the property.

                  Scaled site plan or survey of the property, if applicable.

                  Scaled elevation drawing of proposed changes, if applicable.

                  Scaled perspective drawing of proposed changes, if applicable.

                  Samples of color and/or materials to be used, if applicable.

 ●        If the proposal includes a sign or lettering, a scaled drawing showing the type of lettering to be used, all dimensions and colors, a description of materials to be used, method of illumination and a plan showing the sign's location on the property.

 

            The applicant's name should be noted on all materials submitted, which may not be returned.

 

3.         Consideration of Application.  Once the application form has been completed and the accompanying materials submitted, the application will be scheduled for consideration by the Commission as soon as practicable.  The Commission meets monthly (first Monday) at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Hall at 1 Veteran Drive.  The applicant (or the applicant's agent, if applicable) will be notified of the hearing date and time of the meeting.  The applicant (or agent, if applicable) should plan on attending in person to address any questions or concerns that the Commission may have.  The Commission may request additional information relating to the proposed project and may adjourn the application pending receipt of such additional information, or for other reasons, in the Commission's discretion.

 

4.         Criteria.  Section 140-124 of the Town Code, entitled "Criteria for Approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness", states that the Commission's decisions shall be based upon the following principles:

 

i)              Historic properties shall be retained with their historic features altered as little as possible.

 

ii)             Any alteration of existing property shall be compatible with its historic character, and with the historic  character of surrounding properties, if any. Changes that may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure or site and its environment. These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and  respected. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged  when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment.

 

 

iii)             New construction shall be compatible with the historic character of its surroundings.

 

 

It also states that, in applying principles of compatibility, the Commission shall consider the following factors:

 

            i)          The general design, character and appropriateness to the property of the proposed alteration or new construction;

 

            ii)         The scale of the proposed alteration or new construction in relation to the property itself, surrounding properties and the neighborhood;

 

            iii)         Texture, materials, and color and their relation to similar features of other properties in the neighborhood;

 

            iv)        Visual compatibility with surrounding properties, including proportion of the property's front façade, proportion and arrangement of windows and other openings within the façade, roof shape, and the rhythm of spacing of properties on streets, including setback; and

 

            v)         The importance of historic, architectural or other features to the significance of the property.

 

5.         Decision.  As soon as practicable, the Commission will issue a written decision on the application.  A copy of the decision will be mailed to the applicant (or the applicant's agent, if applicable), and to any other persons who appeared on the record in connection with the application (provided they furnished a mailing address for that purpose).

 

 

FINAL NOTE:     A Certificate of Appropriateness is not a Building Permit.  If a Certificate of Appropriateness is required for a project, it is in addition to and not in lieu of any other permit or approval that may be required.

 

 


Overview of Legislation

 

No person shall carry out any exterior alteration, restoration, reconstruction, demolition, new construction or moving of a building designated as a landmark or any property within a historic district, nor shall any person make any material change in the appearance of such a property, its light fixtures, signs, sidewalks, fences, steps, paving, major landscape feature or design or other exterior elements which affect the appearance and cohesiveness of a historic district, without first obtaining a certificate or appropriateness from the Commission.

 

The Town Building Inspector shall be responsible for administering and maintaining records of the applications for a certificate of appropriateness, whether or not they are accompanied by an application for a building permit. The Building Inspector shall have the same enforcement capability with respect to a certificate of appropriateness that the Inspector may exercise with respect to a building permit.

 

No fees shall be collected for a certificate of appropriateness application.

 

Any application for a variance, special use permit, site plan, building permit, demolition permit, sign permit or subdivision affecting a landmarked property or any property within a historic zoning district under this chapter or a structure or premises listed in the National Register of Historic Places shall be referred to the Commission for its recommendations in order to facilitate the review process and for a certificate of appropriateness, if necessary.

   
Criteria for Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness.

 

In passing upon an application for a certificate of appropriateness, the Commission shall not consider changes to interior spaces. 

 

The Commission's decision shall be based upon the following principles:

 

    (1) Historic properties shall be retained with their historic features altered as little as possible.

 

    (2) Any alteration of existing property shall be compatible with its historic character, and with the 

          historic  character of surrounding properties, if any. Changes that may have taken place in the course of

          time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure or site and its environment. These

          changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and

          respected. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged

          when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material and

          such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood

          or environment.

 

1.

    (3) New construction shall be compatible with the historic character of its surroundings.

 

In determining compatibility, the Commission shall consider the following factors:

 

    (1) The general design, character and appropriateness to the property of the proposed alteration or new 

          construction;

 

    (2) The scale of proposed alteration or new construction in relation to the property itself, surrounding properties,

          and the neighborhood;

 

    (3) Texture, materials and color and their relation to similar features of other properties in the neighborhood;

 

    (4) Visual compatibility with surrounding properties, including proportion of the property's front facade,

          proportion and arrangement of windows and other openings within the facade, roof shape, and the rhythm

          of spacing of properties on the streets, including setback; and

 

    (5) The importance of historic, architectural or other features to the significance of the property.

 

Application Procedure for Certificate of Appropriateness

 

Prior to the commencement of any work requiring a certificate of appropriateness, the owner shall file an application for such certificate with the Building Inspector. The application shall state, where appropriate:

 

    (1) Name, address and telephone number of the applicant;

 

    (2) Location and photographs of property;

 

    (3) Detailed description of proposed changes;

 

    (4) Perspective and elevation drawings, including relationship to adjacent properties;

 

    (5) Samples of color and/or materials to be used;

 

    (6) Where the proposal includes signs or lettering, a scale drawing showing the type of lettering to be used, all

          dimensions and colors, a description of materials to be used, method of illumination and a plan showing the

          sign's location on the property; or

 

    (7) Any other information which the Commission may deem necessary in order to visualize the proposed work.

 

No building permit, demolition permit or sign permit shall be issued for such proposed work until a certificate or appropriateness has first been issued by the Commission. The certificate of appropriateness required by this article shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any permits that may be required by any other laws or regulations of the Town. The Building Inspector shall refer any application for a certificate of appropriateness on property within a historic zoning district or a landmark property to the Commission within 10 working days of receipt by the Building Inspector or by such other deadline established by the Commission.

 

The Commission shall approve, approve with modifications, or deny the certificate of appropriateness within 62 days from receipt of the completed application. The Commission shall hold a public hearing on the application at which an opportunity will be provided for proponents and opponents of the application to present their views.

 

All decisions of the Commission shall be in writing. A copy shall be sent to the applicant by certified mail, return receipt requested, and a copy filed with the Town Clerk and the Town Building Inspector for public inspection. The address used for such notification shall be the address of the applicant as shown on his application for the building permit. The Commission decision shall state the reasons for granting, modifying or denying any application.

 

Enforcement

All work performed pursuant to a certificate or appropriateness issued under this article shall conform to any requirements included therein. It shall be the duty of the Building Inspector to inspect any such work to assure compliance. In the event work is performed that is not being performed in accordance with the certificate of appropriateness, or upon notification of such fact by the Commission, the Building Inspector shall issue a stop-work order and all work shall immediately cease. No further work shall be undertaken on the project as long as a stop-work order is in effect.

Leave a CommentTrackback

>>>>>>>>>   Watch This Space <<<<<<<<<<<
Leave a CommentTrackback

Presentation of Historic Properties Survey to Town Board

by Neil Larson

 

Thursday January 24th 7:30 PM at the Town Hall

 

Since 2001 the Town and Village Historic Preservation Commissions have received six grants from the Certified Local Government Program, a federal fund for the support of local preservation activities administered by the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. These generous matching grants have allowed the Town and Village to survey and assess the significance of its historic resources, identify and document historic properties for national, state and local designations, and undertake activities to expand public awareness and appreciation for New Paltz’s remarkable heritage.  Larson Fisher Associates, a historic preservation planning firm based in Woodstock, New York has served as the Town’s and Village’s consultant in many of these projects. Neil Larson will be making a presentation on this work to the New Paltz Town Board on Thursday Evening, January 24th.

 


 

 

The following article by Erin Quinn was published in the New Paltz Times and summarized the presentation by Neil:

 

Historic Properties

 

Neil Larson, hired by the New Paltz Town and Village as a consultant for various historic preservation grants,  presented an overview at last week's Town Board meeting of what he and the Town and Village Historic Preservation  Commissions had  accomplished between 2003 and 2008.

 

 

Larson and the Commissions surveyed and documented approximately 1,000 properties in the Town of New Paltz  and over 600 properties in the Village of New Paltz in 2003 to help create a data base of their historical,  cultural and architectural significance.  They wrote an overview of the history of architecture in New Paltz dating back to the Colonial Period of the 17th century and up to the modern day architecture of  the 1950's.  Larson, with the help of the preservation commissions,  then went on to fill out detailed data for each suspected historical property with the help of the Haviland-Heidgerd Historical Collection at the Elting Memorial Library.  "They were enormously helpful," Larson said. "They keep detailed property books, which provided us great assistance in filling out the narrative of each property."  In turn, Larson provided the  historical collection with a  digital version of his database.

 

Through a series of grants provided by the National Parks Service, Larson and the preservation commissions were able to conduct the property survey, embark on a rural land-scape survey, which dovetailed with the Town's Open  Space Plan, and most recently, apply for a National Register nomination for a historic downtown New Paltz designation. "Because the Town and the Village adopted a local  historic preservation ordinance and appointed two local commissions, you ultimately have control over how these rare and magnificent culture-historic-architecturally significant properties and districts are handled and preserved," said  Larson.  Larson and members of the two preservation commissions noted that one of their goals was to provide these databases to the local planning boards so that when an application comes up a "flag" is raised if the property is considered to have historical significance.

 

 

 

Hard copies of the home surveys can be found at the Town Hall,Village Hall and the Elting Memorial Library.  "I urge the public to come in and go through this book,"  said Deputy Supervisor Jane Ann Williams. "Be prepared to get sucked in for hours. The information and history  is fascinating."

 

-Erin Quinn

The Commission

The Historic Preservation Commission consists of five members each with a five year term.

 
 Commission Member  Term Ends

John Orfitelli, Chair
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  

     12/2010

Kathleen Interrante

     12/2012

David Gilmour,

     12/2013

Helen Christie

     12/2011

Rita Toohey

     12/2012

 

Other Non-Commission Members

 

Al Marks, Historian

Kitty Brown, Town Board Liaison

 


 

New Paltz named one of America's Dozen Distinctive Destinations

by the National Trust for Historic Preservation

 

Calling New Paltz "a hip college town with a proud history", New Paltz combines the vibrancy and diversity of a campus environment with the traditions and charm of its French Huguenot past." Settled in 1677 and set amidst pastoral fields and hills, the town is just 90 miles from Manhattan -- but urban cares are a world away. Six houses built by the first settlers survive on Huguenot Street, the country's oldest street withits original houses; now open as museums, the houses display period furnishings and European architectural features adapted to the demands of the New World. The village buzzes with eclectic shops and antique stores -- all backed by scenic views of the Shawangunk Ridge.

 

In the Fall, New Paltz comes alive for foliage watchers, apple and pumpkin pickers and wine enthusiasts who tour the area's many vineyards. The Wallkill Valley Rail Trail provides a leafy path for biking, jogging, walking, and cross country skiing, while the Minnewaska State Preserve offers hiking and rock climbing. Nearby, the Mohonk Mountain House, one of the National Trust for Historic Preservation's Historic Hotels of America, beckons visitors to its lofty perch above a deep blue lake.

 

For these reasons, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the country's largest private, nonprofit preservation organization, named New Paltz to the 2004 list of America's Dozen Distinctive Destinations, and annual list of unique and lovingly preserved communities in the United States.

 

"We appreciate this recognition of the Historic Trust," said Supervisor Don Wilen. New Paltz truly is a progressive community rich with history. Here is just one more excellent reason to visit New Paltz."


 

Please refer to links below for minutes from meetings held in 2009.

 

2010-04-19 14:46:39 January (11k)

Agenda

1) Review/Approve Minutes from the December meeting
2) Follow-ups from Prior Meetings
3) New Business
2010-04-19 14:46:39 February (13k)

Agenda

1) Review/Approve Minutes from the January meeting
2) Follow-ups from Prior Meetings
3) New Business
2010-04-19 15:16:05 March-April (12k)

Agenda

1) Review/Approve Minutes from the January and February meetings
2) HHS Cemetery Application for Designation
3) Community Comprehensive Plan Status
4) Process to Advance Ohioville Area Study
5) New Business
2010-04-19 15:16:05 May (8k)

Agenda

1) Review/Approve Minutes from the March-April meeting
2) HHS Cemetery Application for Designation
3) Updates from Prior Meetings
4) New Business
2010-04-19 15:16:05 June (14k)

Agenda

1) Public Comment
2) Nomination for Landmark Designation of the South Putt Corners Burial Ground
3) Review/Approve Minutes from the May meeting
4) Updates from Prior Meetings
5) New Business
2010-04-19 15:16:05 July (11k)

Agenda

1) Public Comment
2) Nomination for Landmark Designation of the Schoonmaker-Freer
3) Ohiovillie Historic District
4) 2010 Grant
5) Review/Approve Minutes from the June meeting
6) New Business
2010-04-19 15:16:05 September (19k)

Agenda

1) Public Comment
2) HHS S.Putt Cemetery Landmark Designation (Continuation of Public Hearing)
3) Schoonmaker-Freer Landmark Nomination
4) GIS Mapping Grant Discussion
5) Comprehensive Plan Update
6) Review/Approval of Minutes from July and August Meetings
2010-04-19 15:16:05 November (16k)

Agenda

1) Public Comment
2) Landmark Designation Nomination from Geraldine Buck
3) Review of Draft Decision for Designation of N.Putt Cemetery
4) Overview/Status of the GIS Mapping Grant
5) Review/Approval of Minutes from July and September Meetings
2010-04-19 20:23:02 December (15k)

Agenda

1) Public Comment
2) Designation of N.Putt Cemetery
- Review Final Draft Decision
- Vote to Close Public Hearing and Proceed to File w/UC Clerk
3) GIS Mapping Grant Status
4) Review/Approval of Minutes from August and November Meetings
5) Setting Priorities for 2010
Leave a CommentTrackback

Overview


 

The Commission may propose an individual property for designation as a landmark if it:

                    (1) Possesses special character or historic or aesthetic interest or value as part of the cultural,

                          political, economic or social history of the locality,  region, state or nation;

 

                    (2) Is identified with historic personages;

 

                    (3) Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural  style;

 

                    (4) Is the work of a designer whose work has significantly influenced an age; or

 

                    (5) Because of a unique location or singular physical characteristic, represents an established and 

                          familiar visual feature of the neighborhood.

 

Notice of a proposed designation shall be sent by registered mail to the owner of the property proposed for designation appearing on the most recent real property tax rolls of the Town, describing the property proposed and announcing a public hearing by the Commission to consider the designation to be held not less than 20 days after the date the notice is mailed to the owner.

 

Simultaneously with the mailing of such notice, the Commission shall cause a copy of the same to be delivered to the Building Inspector and to the Assessor for their respective review and comment. Once the Commission has issued notice of a proposed designation, no building or demolition permits shall be issued by the Building Inspector nor shall any material change be made to the appearance of the property until the Commission has made its decision.

 

The Commission shall hold a public hearing on the date set forth in the notice prior to designation of any landmark. The Commission, owner and any interested parties may present testimony or documentary evidence at the hearing which will become part of a record regarding the historic, architectural or cultural importance of the proposed landmark or historic district.

 

The Commission shall make a decision in writing within 62 days of closing of the public hearing and send a copy of its decision to the owner of the property and file a copy with the Town Clerk, with the Building Inspector and with the Town Assessor. The Commission decision shall state the reasons for granting, modifying or denying a landmark designation.

 

The Commission shall prepare and present to the Ulster County Clerk for recording a notice of each property designated as a landmark and describing the decision of the Commission with regard to such property.

 

Maintenance and Repair Required


Nothing in this article shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance and repair of any exterior architectural feature of a landmark, a property under consideration for landmark designation, or a property within a historical district which does not involve a change in design, material, color or outward appearance.

 

No owner or occupant of real property designated as a landmark or included within a historic district shall permit the property to fall into a serious state of disrepair so as to result in the deterioration of any exterior architectural feature which would, in the judgment of the Commission, produce a detrimental effect upon the character of a landmark or a historic district as a whole or the life and character of the property itself. Examples of such deterioration include:

 

      (1)  Deterioration of exterior wall or other vertical supports.

 

      (2)  Deterioration of roofs or other horizontal members.

 

      (3)  Deterioration of exterior chimneys.

 

      (4)  Deterioration or crumbling of exterior stucco or mortar.

 

      (5)  Ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roofs or foundations, including broken windows or doors.

 

      (6)  Deterioration of any feature so as to create a hazardous condition which could lead to the claim that
            demolition is necessary for the public safety.

 

The Building Inspector shall conduct an annual survey of all buildings designated as landmarks to determine that they are not in a state of disrepair and that no alterations have been made in the features described in § 140-123 of this article without the owner having first obtained a certification of appropriateness.

 

Appeals Regarding Landmark Designation


Any person whose application for a certificate of appropriateness has been denied by the Commission may apply for relief on the ground of hardship, within 30 days of the filing of the decision in the office of the Building Inspector, by making a written application to the Building Inspector for review of the decision by the Town Zoning Board of Appeals.

 

The Zoning Board of Appeals shall review the decision of the Commission at a regularly scheduled or special meeting within 30 days after the application for review is filed with the Building Inspector at which an opportunity to comment on the application is afforded to all interested parties or any member of the public. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall decide the application within 62 days after the meeting, or any adjournments or extensions thereof. The concurring vote of a majority of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be necessary to reverse or modify a decision of the Commission.

 

In order to prove hardship, the applicant shall demonstrate to the Zoning Board of Appeals that:

 

      (1)  The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return, provided that lack of return is substantial as
             demonstrated by competent financial evidence;

 

      (2)  The alleged hardship relating to the property is unique and does not apply to a substantial portion of the
             district or neighborhood;

 

      (3)  The requested use, if approved, would not alter the criteria for the designation of landmarks as described
             in § 140-122A of this article; and

 

(4) The alleged hardship has not been self-created, which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of relief.

Judicial Review


Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Commission regarding landmark designations or a decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding certificates of appropriateness may apply to the Supreme Court for relief by a proceeding under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. The proceeding must be commenced within 30 days after the filing of the decision appealed from in the office of the Town Clerk.

 

Costs shall not be allowed against the Town Board or the Zoning Board of Appeals unless it shall appear to the Court that it acted with gross negligence or in bad faith or with malice in making the decision appealed from.

 

If upon the hearing at the Supreme Court it shall appear to the Court that testimony is necessary for the proper disposition of the matter, it may take evidence or appoint a referee to take such evidence as it may direct and report the same to the Court with his or her findings of fact and conclusions of law, which shall constitute a part of the proceedings upon which the determination of the Court shall be made. The Court may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the decision brought up for review determining all questions which may be presented for determination.

  

Penalties for Offenses


Failure to comply with any of the provisions of this article shall be deemed a violation, and the violator shall be liable for a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $250.

Any person who constructs, alters, demolishes or permits a property designated as a landmark to fall into a serious state of disrepair in violation of this article shall be required to restore the property and its site to its appearance prior to the violation. Any action to enforce this article shall be brought by the Town Attorney, who shall be entitled to recover, in addition to the fine, all costs and expenses incurred by the Town in pursuing compliance with this article.

This civil remedy shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any criminal prosecution and penalty.

  

Designation Form


 

 

 

TOWN OF NEW PALTZ 

PO Box 550

1 Veteran Drive

NEW PALTZ, NEW YORK 12561

 (845) 594-9432   FAX (845) 255-4084

 

 

 

 

 

TOWN of NEW PALTZ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION

 

NOMINATION FOR

 

DESIGNATION OF LANDMARK OR HISTORIC DISTRICT

 

(Pursuant to Article XIV 140-122 of the New Paltz Code)

 

 

 

APPLICANT INFORMATION

 

 

 

Applicant Name:                       ______________________________________________________

 

Mailing Address:                       ______________________________________________________

 

Telephone:                                ______________________________________________________

 

 

If applicant is acting through an authorized agent or legal representative, identify agent's name, address and telephone:

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

 

Does applicant own the property?:                    ____________                        _____________

                                                                               Yes                                              No

 

            If no, identify owner's name, address and telephone:

 

            ____________________________________________________________

 

            ____________________________________________________________

 

            ____________________________________________________________

 

 

If applicant is different from owner,

does the owner concur in this application?         ____________                        _____________

                                                                               Yes                                              No

 

 

If applicant is different from owner, is there  a

relationship between applicant and owner?        ____________                        _____________

                                                                               Yes                                              No

 

            If yes, explain:

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

 

If applicant is different from owner, explain applicant's interest in the property:

 

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

                                                                                   

Is applicant or owner related to any official or employee of the Town of New Paltz or the Town of New Paltz Historic Preservation Commission?

 

                                                ____________                        _____________

                                                                               Yes                                              No

                       

            If yes, explain:   ____________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

PROPERTY INFORMATION

 

 

 

Property Address:        ____________________________________________________________

 

                                    ____________________________________________________________

 

Name of Property

(if applicable):               ____________________________________________________________

 

Tax Map ID No.:         ____________________________________________________________

 

Zoning Classification:    ____________________________________________________________

 

Parcel Size:                   ____________________________________________________________

 

Present Use

of Property:                  ____________________________________________________________

 

Historic Use of

Property:                      ____________________________________________________________

 

Designation Sought

(check one):                 ________        Landmark                     ________        Historic District

 

Year of Construction:    ____________________________________________________________

 

Original architect

(if known):                    ____________________________________________________________

 

Original builder

(if known):                    ____________________________________________________________

 

Original and subsequent owners of the property, including dates of ownership (if known):

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Describe the architectural style of the property:

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Describe primary building materials:

 

            Foundation:      ______________________    Roof:    _________________________

 

            Walls:               ______________________    Other:   _________________________

 

 

How does the property in its present condition materially differ from the property as originally constructed?  Describe material alterations or additions to the property subsequent to its original construction (include dates if known):

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Describe the present condition of the property:

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 


 

Describe site and surroundings (e.g., outbuildings, landscaping, neighborhood):

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Are there any presently known threats to the property?  ___________    ____________

                                                                                                       Yes                       No

            If yes, describe:

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Is the property associated with any personages

of historic significance?                          ____________                        _____________

                                                                               Yes                                              No

 

            If yes, identify and explain:

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Describe the historic significance of the property (i.e., why it merits designation as a landmark or historic district).  Indicate relevant sources of information.  Attach additional sheets as needed:

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

 

 

APPLICANT:  I hereby certify that this application is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.

 

 

 

Applicant's Signature: ________________________________           Date: ___________________

 

 

 

 

 

OWNER:   (if different from applicant, and if owner concurs in application):  I have read and familiarized myself with this application and do hereby consent to its submission and processing.

 

 

Owner's Signature: ___________________________________         Date: ___________________

Please refer to links below for minutes from meetings held in 2010.

2010-04-20 13:38:34
January DRAFT (15k)

Agenda

1) Public Comment
2) GIS Mapping Grant Status
3) Status of Designations In Process
4) Review/Approval of Minutes from August and December Meetings
5) Other
2010-04-20 13:38:34 February DRAFT (12k)

Agenda

1) Public Comment
2) GIS Mapping Grant Status
3) HHS Cemetery Designation Recording
4) New Application for Designation
5) Review Approve Minutes from January and August
2010-04-20 13:38:34 March DRAFT (14k)

Agenda

1) Public Comment
2) Mapping Grant Status (Simons)
3) Review of Comprehensive Plan
4) Other Items from Prior Meetings
a) HHS Cemetery Designation Recording (Orfitelli)
b) Commission Term Dates and Recruitment (Orfitelli)
5) Review/Approval of Minutes from January '10, February '10, and August '09
Leave a CommentTrackback
Town of New Paltz News


Receive HTML?

SUNYNewLogo220
bottomArt